A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

Going through a sharp rise in tourism, the historic centre of Lisbon is being subject to several, much needed, requalification operations. The opportunity for a real, integrative and responsible regeneration is on the table. But is it being overlooked?

share this article

Portugal may be better known as a country of emigrants but throughout its history it has also been the destination for many immigrants. This is particularly so in the country’s capital, Lisbon. Martim Moniz square undoubtedly represents one of the places that best shows the Lisboan proclivity for the confluence and conviviality of different peoples. It is therefore deeply regrettable to see the area’s recent turn towards exclusive private enterprise.

The Lisbon of the Middle Ages had defined quarters for Jewish and Moorish communities. The ghetto on the less salubrious North-West side of the Castle slope had been granted to the Moors in the wake of the Christian conquest. Ever since, this area has been a neighbourhood of immigrants, with communities of slaves freed in the 18th century, the Galician community and, more recently, immigrants from the former colonies and South and East Asia. This historical confluence has been instrumental in Lisbon’s and indeed Portugal’s cultural development. For instance, it was the close proximity of the historic West African migrant community to the poor and marginalised native Lisboan community that provided the conditions for the emergence of Portugal’s national music, Fado.

A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

Rita Aguiar Rodrigues

In the 1940s, with the intention to link Av. Almirante Reis with Rossio (and under the auspices of a neo-imperialist hygiene policy), a section of the Mouraria neighbourhood was demolished to make way for Martim Moniz. Various proposals were thereafter made for what to do with the emptiness resulting from this house clearing. However, not one of them actually got built until the 1980 launch of a public tender to draft an Urban Renovation Plan for the area. The winning designers, Carlos Duarte and José Lamas, declared openly that their solution represented the ‘continuity and permanence’ of the existing urban fabric. But their design was never completed in its totality. Only two shopping centres – Centro Comercial da Mourariaand Centro Comercial do Martim Moniz – were built, constituting the triptych that today, alongside Hotel Mundial, best visually identifies a site which has become one of the most criticized architectural ensembles in Lisbon.

The wholesale market, nowadays mainly run by the Asian community, has since grown in scale. It now hosts the principal economic activity taking place on Martim Moniz. The notorious shopping centres have both also been transformed into packed and bustling galleries, where large scale commerce intermingles in an endless hustle with the small scale informal sector. In contrast, the enormous empty space making up the square in front of the centres, declined rapidly from the moment of its completion. Following the construction of a car-park under the platform and an ill-fated landscaping project spearheaded by the architect Gonçalo Ribeiro Telles, the square’s position on the margins was further entrenched, all the while becoming a hotbed for the sale and consumption of drugs.

A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

Rita Aguiar Rodrigues

In 1997, the space was once again reformulated: around forty kiosks were installed with the objective of revitalising the square with a faux-traditional market selling regional products, antiques and handicrafts. But following the large-scale closure of most of these kiosks, the Lisbon Municipal Council removed the majority of them in 2000 to once again transform the square into a large, open place.

Despite its continued rough and somewhat dangerous reputation, this proved the point at which the square gradually began to be appropriated as a public space by those living and working in the vicinity. Right in the middle of the square or by one of the still surviving kiosks the square was slowly and steadily reoccupied and redefined by the population: as a place for passage, rest, consumption or as a venue for sport. At the same time it became host to religious processions, the beginning of the annual May 1st protest march, demonstrations on behalf of immigrants and many other events. “Sporadic but continuous“, these events were a confident expression of an ordinary Lisboan culture asserting itself.

In 2011, and with good intentions at heart, a public tender was held for the kiosk concession and for the launch of a weekend market. The tender was won by its only bidder: an event production company specialising in sound and video. Within a discourse of defending the “eclectic and ethnographic” character of the site, the bid stipulated the provision of ten kiosks equipped for serving up quick meals, each reflecting a different national cuisine. The central area of the square was to function “as in Colombo [one of Portugal’s largest shopping centres] or as in any other shopping centre of this type”, the concession director stated in the Público newspaper. “To get the project running,” he continued, “we have contacted over 60 associations and communities and also talked to various embassies”.

A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

Rita Aguiar Rodrigues

The stands, open at the weekend for the Fusion Market, are mainly taken up by outlets offering creative objects, end-of-collection brand clothing, vintage clothing, organic produce and similar types of products; all totally out of sync with the otherwise prevailing local dynamics. The kiosks open during the week were leased to different types of food providers – pizza, gourmet hamburgers, sushi, Brazilian gastronomy (…) – in a fairly lame attempt at providing a multicultural portrait, neither representing the locally prevailing type of commerce nor enabling local business participation. The refurbishment of the square, commissioned from CHP Arquitectos by the concession holder, includes the installation of generic shadow casting structures as its main feature. More recently, an artificial grass covering was laid out in between the different café terraces along with some panels featuring photographs of the small local stores, whose owners and clients, in all likelihood, are unable to sample the cocktails served up there at €6 apiece.

A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

Rita Aguiar Rodrigues

The media have enthusiastically covered this operation and correspondingly characterised itas an example of “returning this space to the city”. Clearly, the local residents and small business owners are not included, not even as consumers. The local community finds neither the space nor the purchasing power to engage in the economy that is being generated in the square. The space has been “returned” to a minority with the appropriate level of purchasing power, who drop in on the location on an occasional basis.

What has happened in Martim Moniz Square – now designated Dragon Square by the concession holder – fits in with a series of recent interventions in the historic centre of Lisbon which correlate with the sharp rise in tourism and its associated industries. Similarly it fits in with the generalised acceptance of regeneration driven by gentrification generator mechanisms such as entrepreneurialism and the so called “creative industries”. Even while not garnering any support from residents, workers or traditional users of the square (and not even targeting such communities) these operations are whitewashed and justified by the fact that they improve the area from the perspective of an elite endowed with the necessary purchasing power to enjoy the improvements. It is for them that the entire initiative was really destined and deemed appropriate.

A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

Rita Aguiar Rodrigues

Delegating all responsibilities to a private company denies Lisbon and the multitude of ordinary Lisboans the opportunity for a real, integrative and responsible regeneration. A collective project of regeneration could leverage the city’s relative lag in relation to other old European cities and could likewise meet the true needs and opportunities of the locally present population by driving local economic revitalisation. Instead Martim Moniz’s transformation is the responsibility of a private company with a solely promotional discourse that only superficially reaches out to meet the objectives and intentions of public institutions.

Unfortunately, Martim Moniz is far from a unique case. This phenomenon extends along entire streets, centuries old public facilities and is also specifically manifested in the gutting of the Pombaline Downtown area due to the irresponsible licensing of an absurd number of hotels. The conversion is underway. Let Lisbon be warned.

A Warning to Lisbon: The Fight for Meaning in Martim Moniz

Rita Aguiar Rodrigues

Rita Aguiar Rodrigues is a Lisbon-based architect. She holds an MA in Architecture from Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa and she recently worked in São Paulo at MMBB Arquitetos. In addition to her freelance work, Rita is an associate architect at ateliermob.
João Barrier
This is an opinion. Well documented and well written, but still just an opinion. I respect, but, I am sorry I can't agree. Much could have been done differently, but the place is undoubtely better after this intervention that cannot be analysed indepently to what has been done in the whole neihhbourhood. Take "Rua dos Anjos" for example, where no one except drugdealers, hookers and their pimps, could walk there and now is a safe place to chill.
Miguel da Silva
The problem with Portuguese "experts" is that they do the hard part: criticizing but never provide a sustainable alternative. This space was a drug hole where only the poor emigrants would call home. It was ugly, full of garbage and not safe. It's true that the kiosks didn't work. They are way too expensive and too poch for the an area that needed time to change that much. With this said, I think that a change was needed and its better than before. I agree that the private owners of the project must be difficult people, not to call them arrogant idiots, but I also agree that the area needs to integrate the rest of the city that have been the real excluded ones for years: the middle class Lisbon residents and the tourists. Martin Moniz is a prime area of Lisbon and needs to look better and tidy. Yes, make it "little asia" or "little India" but do an integrative process with the rest of the city. Doing a project for the "Local" people would not be an integration it would be getting the place even more exclusive. About the last paragraph of the article, after working in tourism for more than 10 years I can say that there is a big demand for hotels in Lisbon. We have numerous 5* backpacks , guesthouses, etc. But not hotels. And since the country cannot produce anything decent or in quantity to export, tourism keeps filling in the holes with much appreciated money for all of us. Lisbon has won more prizes in the last years than any other capital in the world and the changes have been amazing. We now have a true multicultural capital that is clean, smells good and has a little of everything without loosing its essence. What I would like to see was a true alternative.
Rose
I am very curious about the reseach material used for this article - or is it simply an opinion piece? Going through the paragraphs I can read a lot of information anyone with access to a computer could get and opinions that I am still at a loss if they were derived from careful documentation and discussion with the locals/users/vendors/responsible governmental agents or simply from (...) the writer's opinion. Much lacks in the explaining how these facts were arrived at and therefore, I am not so sure what sense it has on a 'research platform' and would very much like to have this explained if possible.
Peter the Chinaman
I am there from the beginning of this project. I signed two kiosks (paying 1,800€/monthly per kiosk plus tax) I was accepted to join just a day before the inauguration because "someone" had aborted the project for some reason and "no one" was there to fill the blank. So I was lured into this project thinking it was a good positive thought that I could be part of making this wonderful part of the city even more enjoyable than before, I specially loved the idea of blending cultures together and focusing on the people living in the area and showing the experience to all visitors, but sadly what I ended up receiving in exchange of the "high rents", "hard-work & dedication" was a constant racist excuse to leave the project and an uneducated behaviours by the irresponsibles of the project. Every year before Summer peak, the responsible would come and say "You should leave because I have got lots of people interested to get into this project and they are more suitable." Only if they knew, that the conditions are bad, either business wise or safety wise. I DO LOVE THE CITY, what I hate are the "Jerksters" pretending to be nice, "Smartarses" that think they know everything and the "troup" leader that is fooling people around just because they have a degree on art... I am fed up, I have gathered enough proves and testimonials, fact is that if they keep doing this to the people that really care, it will not remain long because reality will show the truth behind the fake. Good Luck!
AquiMoraGente
An inspiring example how to create and maintain public spaces wich make people enjoy and be happier in their community. http://www.ted.com/talks/amanda_burden_how_public_spaces_make_cities_work
AquiMoraGente
As Filipe said real, integrative regeneration needs time...as well as responsible public politics.What as happened in Martim Moniz Sq fits in another intervention in Historic Centre, designated "Pink Street" in Cais do Sodré.Here the Municipality delegated all responsibilities (and profits) to the Bars and Disco Association, sponsered by a brand of spirit- Vodka Absolut, excluding local residents and other economic agents other than night life industry. With the objective of revitalizing Cais do Sodré throw "cultural events" entire streets are occupied all night with binge drinking and a density of noisy bars pushing the inhabitants of this area out of their homes.
João Veríssimo
I've been living in this area for over 10 years ... there were drug dealers and prostitutes on the neighbouring streets but never in Martim Moniz square. They still remain in the area and drug dealers are extremely happy to cater for a new market of foreign erasmus kids eager to live the experience of cosmopolitism through these fake multi-ethnic kiosks. Maybe Pedro is right when stating no one would dare to come here (probably because he belongs to that segment of the population that believed the stereotype depicted and never set foot on the square), but he forgets to say that it was always lively with people that actually lived here: from kids with their bikes, the cricket matches by the asian comunity, skateboarders, etc... We want our uncool, untrendy, square back. We can live happily without the drunken haze of cheap chill out music. We are not represented by someone else's concept of diversity. These trends will simply fade. We will stay here forever.
Filipe
"real, integrative and responsible regeneration" is not possible to have without time, lots of time. This square needed an urgent intervention, and although the results aren't perfect, it's way better then it was before. The real, integrative regeneration will start from now on, when local population starts owning the place, which they have already started doing, as you can see by the weekend cricket games, held there.
Miguel de Sepúlveda Velloso
Outstanding article. The square is now a void of local residents, decaying urban fabric, allien to the historical city center. Alongside with the steady rising in hotel numbers and a dangerous and, very often, wild night, Lisboa is doomed to fail.
Pedro
yeah.. because im sure the square was much better when was full of drug dealers, prostitutes and no one would even dare to go there for being affraid of being robbed.
add comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

FA at TodaysArt: Seaside Architecture

2014

Porto’s Ruinous Circle

2013

Haussmann and the Sanitisation of Amsterdam

2015